One week ago, we hosted a Chronic Absence Working Session for that brought together 37 people from 16 different schools and organizations across Oakland. The slides from the session are available here. As a reminder, a student is considered chronically absent if they are absent (excused or unexcused) for 10% or more of the days for which they are enrolled. So for a typical 180 day school calendar, a student would need to miss at least 18 days (or about 3 1/2 weeks) of school in order to be considered chronically absent.
One of the focuses of the working session was for each school to create a group of current students that are just above or just below the chronically absent threshold. It’s likely that combination of tier-1 (whole-school) and tier-2 (targeted) attendance strategies (see image below) can be used to help improve attendance next year for this group of students. A sample data spreadsheet for identifying an attendance intervention group is available here.
As a next step, we would encourage all school teams to review qualitative data to better understand their quantitative attendance data. One particularly useful method for obtaining qualitative attendance data is conducting empathy interviews with students and families to learn more about attendance patterns. An empathy interview is an open-ended interview structure that allows you to get a deeper understanding of why a student may be absent. You need not interview every student – even a handful of interviews can provide valuable information.
After analyzing data, school teams brainstormed potential tier-1 and tier-2 strategies to employ at their school based on the following categories: A) Engaging Students and Families, B) Recognizing Good and Improved Attendance, C) Monitoring and Attendance Data and Practice, and D) Providing Personalized Early Outreach. The results of the brainstorming session are available here.
The next Chronic Absence Working Session will take place on Thursday, 9/12/19. You can RSVP here: bit.ly/oakcore091219. In the meantime, please make sure to check out Attendance Works for more resources related to attendance. You can check out his page to learn about past and future webinars related to attendance.
The Education Trust-West and CORE have partnered to publicly recognize schools throughout California that are supporting students to achieve high academic growth. At these high-growth schools, students are making academic gains faster than similar students at similar schools throughout the California. Right here in Oakland we have 43 high growth schools. This is a great accomplishment for school staff and students!
In future posts, we will dive into more detail about CORE’s student growth model and how it provides a different perspective from data available on the California School Dashboard.
Click here to view the complete list of high growth schools across California. Additionally, high growth schools will be acknowledged on the Ed Equity Navigator, a soon-to-be-released website that will present California education data through an equity lens.
On April 11 we hosted the first of four College Data Study Sessions to examine college matriculation, persistence, and degree completion data for Oakland students. During the kick-off event, stakeholders representing 20 different schools and organizations from across Oakland collaborated to review college data and brainstorm how Oakland can use this data as a community. For those that were unable to attend, the agenda and slide deck are available here.
During the session, we reviewed anonymous college matriculation and persistence data for Oakland schools made available from the CORE Data Collaborative. In the spirit of using data as a flashlight, we started with reviewing anonymous data, however, over time as we learn and build trust we plan to make school-level data available publicly. As we analyzed this data we considered the following questions:
Not surprisingly, the data generated more questions than answers. We hope to address many of these questions in future study sessions.
To inspire our work for future sessions, we also reviewed several college data artifacts from other communities. From these artifacts, we hope to learn how we can use college data to support Oakland students to and through college. Here are the artifacts that we investigated:
I look forward to working with community members to craft the agenda for our next session on Tuesday, 9/24, Noon – 2pm (RSVP HERE). Lunch will be served and location is to be determined.
While we won’t be convening as group again until September, Lighthouse Community Public Schools will be hosting several webinars highlighting best practices for College and Career readiness in the next few weeks. Sign up here.
Preparing Students for the 21st Century Workforce: Adding a CTE Pathway to a Small School (April 25, 2019 @ 9:15 – 10:00am PDT)
College and Career Best Practices (April 25, 2019 @ 10:15 – 11:00am PDT)
Attend to the Language of the Standards: Planning for Mastery and Student Supports (April 25 @ 1 – 2:15pm PDT)
Chronic absence is a key barrier to achievement for many students in Oakland and other undeserved communities. In this working session we will share tools and protocols for school teams to analyze the current year’s chronic absence data. Using this information, school teams will identify steps that can be taken between now and the beginning of the 19-20 school year to help improve overall attendance and decrease chronic absence.
The Chronic Absence Working Session will take place on Thursday, 5/9, 10am – Noon (lunch will be served) at Oakland International High School (4521 Webster St). The school is about about a 10-15min walk from the MacArthur BART station and several AC Transit bus stops. Street parking is also available nearby. RSVP HERE to attend.
Which schools can participate? Any Oakland public school can participate. The agenda will be focused on supporting schools that are still developing their practices around reducing chronic absence. Schools with more developed practices are more than welcome to participate and share their systems with other schools.
Who should attend from my school? Participating schools are asked to bring at least 2 people but not more than 4 people. Schools are encouraged to bring members of your your attendance team, which will vary from school to school. Participants could include: principal or assistant principal, family engagement coordinator, attendance clerk, operations manager, or other staff members.
What do I need to bring with me? In order to fully benefit from this working session, you will need to bring up-to-date, student-level chronic absence data. This information can generally be exported from your student information system (Aeries, PowerSchool, Illuminate, etc.). If you need assistance accessing this data, please contact Jonathon Stewart (firstname.lastname@example.org).
When new students arrive on Day 1 of a new school year, they’re about the same age as their classmates but have various levels of proficiency. Everyone knows this. Every student is unique and has different circumstances that help determine where they are in school. But when it comes time for the state test, there is a bar for proficiency: are students reaching the state standards, or are they not?
We also know many students who have not reached the state’s standard worked incredibly hard and may have made huge gains over the course of a school year. Their educators tapped into something that works. Their schools, serving a large percentage of high-needs students, may be on to something.
This is where the new “Academic Growth” indicator for the CORE Data Collaborative can be especially useful: it gives as clear a picture as we have of the impact of the teaching at a school. Who the students are and the schools they attend matters less. Only how much progress they have made compared to their peers.
“I love the growth point because it compares our progress to the progress made by similar students in similar schools,” Urban Montessori Head of School Krishna Feeney says. “That is something that is easier to digest for families. It’s like, ‘We were here and this is how much we’ve grown in each of these areas compared to similar students in similar schools.’ And that is something our community is asking for.”
Urban Montessori is a locally grown Oakland public school and one of 27 Oakland charter schools that participate in the CORE Data Collaborative (all 87 district-run schools participate). CORE began in 2010 when California’s large, urban school districts came together around new academic standards and training for teachers and administrators.
The collaborative, which includes the school districts of Oakland, Fresno, Garden Grove, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco and Santa Ana, secured a waiver from No Child Left Behind regulations in 2013 to evaluate schools on more than just test scores.
The more holistic way schools are evaluated through CORE includes data on student-level academic growth, high school readiness, students’ social-emotional skills and schools’ culture-climate (which is taken through surveys administered to students, teachers and families). CORE data also includes traditional measures of test scores, graduation rates and absenteeism also found in the Oakland Public School Report Card and California School Dashboard. CORE then provides an index of similar schools in terms of proficiency and growth for which to compare.
The kind of data CORE provides is especially useful for a school like Urban Montessori which uses a non-traditional school model. For example, Montessori philosophy stresses the importance of three-year cycles (same classroom environment for three years rather than one), which doesn’t exactly line up with California’s standardized test-every-year system.
Feeney said an especially exciting piece of the CORE data for the Urban school community was seeing a huge jump in the growth data for its new middle school students (this is the first year Urban has had an 8th grade class). The students now in middle school began at Urban on Day 1 of the school and have been through two three-year cycles: 1st-3rd grade and of 4th-6th grade.
“It’s making us wonder and hope — we don’t have enough data yet to say it outright — once we’re hitting middle school, it’s all falling into place,” Feeney says. “Those kids who are now in middle school have been here since Year 1, and they’re able to bring it together and demonstrate that on a state test even better than our younger students.”
CORE data is shared with school administrators and is not publically-available, so it’s up to Feeney and Urban staff to make sure the school community is aware of what this data is saying. Feeney has shared the data with the board, presenting charts, graphs and trends to the board’s academic committee and full board. Part of that is explaining the growth model and how it’s different from “status” and “change.”
“Our work is to be asking questions and hold the school accountable for learning, bringing back lessons and strategies that are working,” says Greg Klein, the Urban Montessori Board Chairperson. “As a board member, we care about a lot of data points: we want to know the status and percent of students who got all the way to grade level standards, and we want to know that broken down by subgroup. We also want to know how that has changed year over year. And the third part of understanding how the school is doing is growth.”
Growth, Klein says, is especially important. “The way that I think about growth is as a leading indicator,” he says. “Multiple years of high, above-average growth is ultimately going to move the needle on percent proficient.”
Feeney says that because the data is so new, the school is figuring out how best to use it. “It’s really useful and interesting for me to go through and compare ourselves to other similar schools,” she says, “and it’s on my radar to find ways to connect and figure out what they’re doing and how they’re using the data.” She would like to empower educators and the school community to interact with the data, too.
“For me, I’m continuing to figure out how to use the information to share with the community something that shows where we started and where we’re going,” she says.
Welcome to the online home for the Oakland CORE Data Collaborative! On this blog we will post helpful resources for using data to support all of Oakland’s district-run and charter public schools.
What is the Oakland CORE Data Collaborative? Launched in 2017, the Oakland CORE Data Collaborative (Collaborative) builds on the work of the CORE Data Collaborative (CORE Data). The Collaborative is a learning community among Oakland schools that enables schools to share data in order to address common challenges faced by school leaders and educators.
By taking part in the Collaborative, schools can access unique data such as the CORE Growth Model, which measures the impact schools have on student academic progress over a period of time. Additionally, schools can take part in data-driven conversations with other schools throughout the year. Through the Collaborative, we hope schools can learn from each other to better understand their successes and challenges.
What is CORE? Founded in 2010, CORE serves public school districts in Fresno, Garden Grove, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco and Santa Ana. These districts collaborate to implement new academic standards and improve training for teachers and administrators. CORE Data is an initiative of CORE, and creates opportunities for schools in California to share data with each other and collaborate toward solving common challenges. Currently more than 50 local education agencies take part in CORE Data.
CORE Data members include Oakland Unified, San Francisco Unified, Aspire Public Schools, Green Dot Public Schools, Riverside County, and many more.
As a founding CORE member, Oakland Unified’s superintendent, Kyla Johnson-Trammell, serves on the CORE Board of Directors. She meets bimonthly with other superintendents to drive the direction of CORE’s work.
What are the benefits of CORE Data?
Access to reports that allow school leaders to easily compare their performance to other schools locally and statewide.
Access to unique data points – such as Academic Growth, High School Readiness, and College Data – that are not easily available.
Opportunities to collaborate with schools across California.